Skip to main content
Northern IrelandMathsSyllabus dot point

How do we use a sample to test a claim about a population, and decide whether to reject it?

The structure of a hypothesis test, the null and alternative hypotheses, the significance level and critical region, one-tailed and two-tailed tests, and carrying out a binomial hypothesis test.

A CCEA A-Level Mathematics answer on the structure of a hypothesis test, the null and alternative hypotheses, the significance level and critical region, one-tailed and two-tailed tests, and carrying out a hypothesis test on a binomial probability.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.813 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

CCEA wants you to set up and carry out a hypothesis test: state the null and alternative hypotheses, choose a significance level, find the critical region or a tail probability, distinguish one-tailed from two-tailed tests, and reach a conclusion in context. The binomial hypothesis test is the standard case examined here.

The answer

The structure of a test

Significance level and critical region

One-tailed and two-tailed tests

Carrying out a binomial test

Assume XB(n,p0)X \sim B(n, p_0) under H0H_0. Compute the probability of a result as extreme as the one observed, in the direction of H1H_1 (an upper or lower tail). Compare this with the significance level: if it is smaller, reject H0H_0; if not, do not reject. Always state the conclusion in the words of the original problem.

Worked example: a one-tailed binomial test

Examples in context

Example 1. Testing a new treatment. A trial claiming a new drug helps more than the standard 30%30\% of patients is a one-tailed binomial test: if the observed success count is improbably high under H0:p=0.3H_0: p = 0.3, we reject it. Hypothesis testing is the backbone of evidence-based medicine.

Example 2. Quality auditing. An auditor checking whether a defect rate exceeds the claimed level tests H0:p=p0H_0: p = p_0 against H1:p>p0H_1: p > p_0. A significant result triggers action; a non-significant one means the evidence is insufficient, not that the claim is proven.

Try this

Q1. State a suitable null hypothesis for testing whether a coin is fair. [1 mark]

  • Cue. H0:p=0.5H_0: p = 0.5.

Q2. For a two-tailed test at the 5%5\% level, what is the probability in each tail? [1 mark]

  • Cue. 2.5%2.5\% in each tail.

Q3. A tail probability is 0.030.03 for a one-tailed test at the 5%5\% level. What is the conclusion? [1 mark]

  • Cue. Since 0.03<0.050.03 < 0.05, reject H0H_0.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of CCEA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

CCEA 20208 marksA coin is suspected of being biased towards heads. In 2020 tosses it lands heads 1515 times. Test at the 5%5\% significance level whether there is evidence of bias towards heads.
Show worked answer →

Let pp be the probability of heads. State the hypotheses:

H0:p=0.5H_0: p = 0.5 (fair) versus H1:p>0.5H_1: p > 0.5 (biased towards heads), a one-tailed test.

Under H0H_0, XB(20,0.5)X \sim B(20, 0.5). We find the probability of a result as extreme as observed:

P(X15)=1P(X14).P(X \ge 15) = 1 - P(X \le 14).

From tables P(X14)=0.9793P(X \le 14) = 0.9793, so P(X15)=10.9793=0.0207P(X \ge 15) = 1 - 0.9793 = 0.0207.

Since 0.0207<0.050.0207 < 0.05, the result is significant. We reject H0H_0: there is evidence at the 5%5\% level that the coin is biased towards heads.

Markers reward the hypotheses, the binomial under H0H_0, the tail probability, the comparison with 0.050.05, and a conclusion in context.

CCEA 20197 marksA manufacturer claims 10%10\% of items are defective. A sample of 2525 contains 11 defective. Test at the 5%5\% level whether the defect rate is lower than claimed.
Show worked answer →

Let pp be the proportion defective. Hypotheses:

H0:p=0.10H_0: p = 0.10 versus H1:p<0.10H_1: p < 0.10, a one-tailed (lower) test.

Under H0H_0, XB(25,0.10)X \sim B(25, 0.10). Find P(X1)P(X \le 1):

P(X1)=P(X=0)+P(X=1)=(0.9)25+25(0.1)(0.9)24=0.0718+0.1994=0.2712.P(X \le 1) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) = (0.9)^{25} + 25(0.1)(0.9)^{24} = 0.0718 + 0.1994 = 0.2712.

Since 0.2712>0.050.2712 > 0.05, the result is not significant. We do not reject H0H_0: there is insufficient evidence that the defect rate is lower than 10%10\%.

Markers reward the hypotheses, the binomial under H0H_0, the lower-tail probability, the comparison with 0.050.05, and the conclusion.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this