Skip to main content
EnglandClassical CivilisationSyllabus dot point

How did coins spread Augustus' image and messages across the Roman world?

The Imperial Image: the use of coinage to disseminate Augustus' image and titles, the messages carried by coin types (military success, peace, divine connection and dynasty), and the strengths and limits of coins as evidence.

An OCR A-Level Classical Civilisation (H408/22) study of Augustan coinage. Covers how coins carried Augustus' portrait, titles and messages (military victory, peace, divine connection and dynasty) across the empire, and the strengths and limits of coins as evidence, with the source and essay skills the paper rewards.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.817 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Coins were Augustus' most far-reaching medium of image-making. For this option you must understand how coinage disseminated his image and titles, the messages that coin types carried (military success, peace, divine connection and dynasty), and the strengths and limits of coins as evidence. The paper tests precise knowledge (AO1), analysis and evaluation of coins as sources (AO2 and AO3) and your own argument.

The answer

Coins as a medium of mass communication

The messages on the coins

Coin reverse types advertised the core themes of Augustus' image:

  • Military success: a coin showing a kneeling Parthian returning a Roman standard, with a legend such as signis receptis ("the standards recovered"), presented the diplomatic return of the standards lost by Crassus as a glorious victory and the humbling of Parthia.
  • Peace: types showing the closed doors of the Temple of Janus (shut only when Rome was wholly at peace) or symbols such as the olive branch, advertising the Pax Augusta.
  • Divine connection: the DIVI F title, and types linking Augustus to Apollo, his patron god, asserting divine favour and descent.
  • Dynasty: coins showing his intended heirs, Gaius and Lucius Caesar, promoting the succession within his family.

The strengths of coins as evidence

The limits of coins as evidence

Coins also have clear limitations:

  • The images are tiny and the legends heavily abbreviated, so it is debated how far ordinary users actually "read" or understood the messages.
  • A coin can convey only a simple message, where a monument or a poem could develop a richer idea.
  • Coins tell us what the regime wanted to project, not how it was received, so they are evidence of intention, not of public opinion.

For these reasons coins are best seen as uniquely far-reaching but complementary to statues, buildings and poetry, not a substitute for them.

Examples in context

A strong essay on coinage would weigh its unmatched reach against the simplicity of its messages, concluding that coins complemented the other media.

Try this

Q1. Explain how Augustan coins conveyed the message of peace. You must refer to specific examples. [10 marks]

  • What the marker wants. AO1 with AO3: give examples (the closed doors of the Temple of Janus, the olive branch) and explain how each advertised the Pax Augusta to those who handled the coins.

Q2. 'Coins tell us what Augustus wanted people to think, but not what they actually thought.' To what extent do you agree? [marked out of 20; real H408/22 tariff is 30]

  • Cue. Argue that coins are strong evidence of the regime's intended messages but weak evidence of reception, while considering what other sources can add. Reach a judgement supported by named coin types.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

OCR H408/22 2020 (stimulus style)10 marksLook at the image of an Augustan coin showing the Parthian standards. How does this coin convey a message about Augustus? Refer to the image. [10]
Show worked answer →

A 10-mark stimulus question (AO1 5, AO3 5). The marker rewards close engagement with the prescribed source.

AO1 (knowledge). Identify the coin type: a coin (such as a denarius) showing a kneeling Parthian returning a Roman standard, with a legend referring to the recovered standards (signis receptis).

AO3 (analysis). Explain the message: the diplomatic return of the standards lost by Crassus is presented as a military victory and the humbling of Parthia, projecting Augustus as a conquering, honour-restoring leader. Note the portrait and titles on the obverse.

Conclude on how the coin spread this message of victory to everyone who handled money.

OCR H408/22 2022 (essay, true tariff 30)20 marks'Coins were the most effective way Augustus spread his image.' To what extent do you agree? [marked here out of 20; the real H408/22 essay tariff is 30]
Show worked answer →

The extended-essay type (30 marks live, capped at 20 here). Tests AO1, AO2 and AO3.

For (coins effective). Coins circulated everywhere and reached everyone, carrying Augustus' portrait, titles and changing messages (victory, peace, dynasty, divinity) across the whole empire in a way statues and monuments in Rome could not.

Against (limits). Coin images were tiny and their legends abbreviated; their messages may not have been "read" by all users, and grand monuments and poetry could convey richer ideas.

Judgement. The top band argues a clear line, for instance that coins were uniquely effective for reach and repetition, even if each message was simple, so they complemented rather than replaced statues, buildings and poetry. Support with named coin types.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this