How was the Spartan state governed through its kings, gerousia, ephors and assembly, and how did these institutions balance one another?
The Spartan constitution: the dual kingship, the gerousia, the ephors and the apella (assembly), the Great Rhetra, and how the prescribed sources (Xenophon, Aristotle, Plutarch, Thucydides) present and judge the system.
An OCR A-Level Ancient History depth study guide to the Spartan constitution. Covers the dual kingship, the gerousia, the ephors and the apella assembly, the Great Rhetra, the mixed-constitution debate, and how the prescribed sources (Xenophon, Aristotle, Plutarch, Thucydides) describe and evaluate the Spartan system of government.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
The Sparta depth study opens with the constitution: the unusual system of government that contemporaries found fascinating and that the prescribed sources describe and debate. This page covers the dual kingship, the gerousia (council of elders), the ephors, the apella (assembly), and the tradition of the Great Rhetra, and it shows how Xenophon, Aristotle, Plutarch and Thucydides present and judge the system. The depth study rewards arguments built on and from these sources, with awareness of their differing dates and agendas.
The answer
The dual kingship
The kings mattered most in war and religion; in domestic politics they were one element among several, and the sources show them frequently checked by the ephors and gerousia.
The gerousia and the ephors
The relationship between gerousia and ephors is central to the constitution: the gerousia gave continuity and judicial authority, the ephors gave annual, dynamic control. A favourite essay debate is whether the ephors were the most powerful element, and the sources let you argue both ways.
The apella and the Great Rhetra
The apella, the assembly of full Spartiate citizens, elected officials (including ephors and gerontes) and voted on major issues such as war and peace, but it voted by acclamation and within limits: the gerousia framed what it considered, and the ephors managed proceedings. The Great Rhetra, the tradition preserved in Plutarch's Life of Lycurgus, is presented as the founding charter of the system, attributing the constitution to the legendary Lycurgus, though its historicity is uncertain.
This is also where source evaluation bites: the constitution survives through writers with different purposes, a contemporary admirer (Xenophon), a later critic (Aristotle), and a much later idealiser (Plutarch), so the "Lycurgan" picture must be handled critically.
Examples in context
A model answer treats the constitution as a balance to be analysed and argues from named sources, rather than describing each institution in turn.
Try this
Q1. Assess how far the Spartan constitution balanced the power of its different elements. [20 marks, depth essay style]
- What the marker wants. An argument from the prescribed sources that the kings (military, religious), gerousia (judicial, probouleutic), ephors (executive, supervisory) and assembly (electoral, deciding) checked one another, with a judgement on how effective the balance was and where power really lay.
Q2. How many ephors were there, and how often were they elected? [2 marks]
- Cue. Five ephors, elected annually, forming the most dynamic and supervisory element of the constitution.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of OCR exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
OCR H407/11 201920 marks'The ephors were the most powerful element in the Spartan constitution.' How far do the sources support this view? [shown at the 20-mark cap; the depth essay is worth 36 in the full paper]Show worked answer →
A Section B depth-study essay (AO1, AO2 and AO3), shown at the 20-mark cap (worth 36 in the full paper). Build an argument on and from the sources.
For the ephors. Five annually elected ephors could oversee and even prosecute the kings, summoned and presided over the assembly, controlled foreign policy and supervised the agoge; Aristotle stresses their near-tyrannical power.
Against. The kings retained military command and religious authority; the gerousia framed business and held judicial power; the assembly decided. Power was balanced rather than concentrated.
Judgement. Use Xenophon and Aristotle to argue the ephors were the most dynamic check but worked within a balanced system; Aristotle's criticism of their election as "childish" warns against taking their power as absolute. The top level argues from the prescribed sources and judges.
OCR H407/11 202112 marksHow useful is Aristotle's Politics Book 2 for understanding the weaknesses of the Spartan constitution? [shown at the 12-mark source-utility style]Show worked answer →
A source-utility evaluation (AO3) on a prescribed source.
Value. Aristotle is an acute political analyst writing a systematic critique, valuable for the structural weaknesses he identifies: the unaccountable power and poor election of the ephors, the problems of the gerousia (elderly, elected "childishly", holding office for life), and the dangers of land concentration and the position of women.
Limitations. Aristotle writes in the fourth century, after Sparta's decline, with a philosophical agenda about the ideal state, so his critique is shaped by hindsight and theory rather than contemporary observation.
Judgement. Highly useful for a critical, analytical view of the constitution's flaws, but to be set against Xenophon's more admiring contemporary account and read as theory. Top answers judge usefulness for the enquiry.
Related dot points
- The helots and Spartan control: the status and role of the helots, the perioikoi, the krypteia and the methods of repression, the great revolt after the earthquake of 464 BC, and how dependence on and fear of the helots shaped Spartan society and foreign policy.
An OCR A-Level Ancient History depth study guide to the helots and Spartan control. Covers the status and role of the helots, the perioikoi, the krypteia and methods of repression, the helot revolt after the 464 BC earthquake, and how dependence on and fear of the helots shaped Spartan society and foreign policy, with evaluation of Thucydides and Plutarch.
- The Spartan way of life: the agoge (the state upbringing and military education), the syssitia (common messes) and their role in citizenship, the ideals of obedience, endurance and equality among the homoioi, and how the sources present the Spartan system.
An OCR A-Level Ancient History depth study guide to Spartan society. Covers the agoge state upbringing and military education, the syssitia common messes and their link to citizenship, the ideals of obedience, endurance and equality among the homoioi, and how Xenophon, Plutarch and Aristotle present and judge the Spartan way of life.
- The position of Spartan women: their upbringing and physical training, their roles in marriage and the household, their control of property, their public freedom compared with other Greek poleis, and the differing and often hostile or admiring source traditions.
An OCR A-Level Ancient History depth study guide to the position of women in Sparta. Covers the upbringing and physical training of Spartan girls, marriage and household roles, the control of property, their unusual public freedom compared with other Greek poleis, and how the sources (Xenophon, Plutarch, Aristotle) present them with admiration or criticism.
- Sparta in the Peloponnesian War 431 to 404 BC: Spartan strategy and aims against Athens, the role of Brasidas in the Archidamian War, the decisive part of Lysander and the Persian alliance, and the final defeat of Athens in 404 BC.
An OCR A-Level Ancient History depth study guide to Sparta in the Peloponnesian War 431 to 404 BC. Covers Spartan strategy and aims, the role of Brasidas in the Archidamian War, the decisive contribution of Lysander and the Persian alliance, and the final defeat of Athens in 404 BC, with evaluation of Thucydides and Xenophon.
- AO3 source skills: evaluating ancient sources for their utility to a stated enquiry, using content, provenance (nature, origin and purpose) and contextual knowledge, and reaching a judgement on usefulness rather than labelling a source reliable or biased.
An OCR A-Level Ancient History skills guide to evaluating ancient sources for the AO3 source-utility question. Explains how to judge a source's value for a stated enquiry using content, provenance and contextual knowledge, why utility is not the same as reliability, and how to reach a judgement, with a worked example transferable to Greek and Roman topics.
Sources & how we know this
- OCR A Level Ancient History H407 specification — OCR (2017)
- Xenophon, Constitution of the Lacedaemonians; Aristotle, Politics Book 2; Plutarch, Life of Lycurgus — Perseus Digital Library