Skip to main content
EnglandPsychologySyllabus dot point

How do psychologists select participants, and what ethical principles must they follow?

Sampling (target population, sample, random, opportunity, volunteer, systematic and stratified sampling; bias and generalisability) and ethics (the BPS principles: informed consent, deception, right to withdraw, protection from harm, confidentiality, and dealing with ethical issues).

An Eduqas A-Level Psychology answer to sampling and ethics in Component 2. Covers target populations and samples, random, opportunity, volunteer, systematic and stratified sampling, sampling bias and generalisability, and the BPS ethical principles with ways of dealing with ethical issues.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.814 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

Component 2 covers sampling and ethics. You must know the sampling methods (and their bias and generalisability) and the BPS ethical principles, and be able to apply ways of dealing with ethical issues to a study.

The answer

Sampling

Ethics

Bias and generalisability

A biased sample (for example only students, or only volunteers) limits how far results apply. The more representative the sample, the more confidently the findings generalise to the target population. Larger, well-chosen samples reduce the influence of anomalies.

Examples in context

Example 1. Volunteer bias. A study advertised in a newspaper attracts people who are more motivated, curious or have spare time, so the sample is not typical. This volunteer bias limits generalisability and is a standard weakness of self-selected samples.

Example 2. Dealing with deception via debrief. If a study must briefly mislead participants about its aim to avoid demand characteristics, a full debrief afterwards (explaining the real aim and offering to withdraw data) addresses the ethical issue, showing how researchers balance validity and ethics.

Try this

Q1. Explain one strength and one weakness of volunteer sampling. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Strength: it is easy and gives willing, committed participants; weakness: volunteer bias means the sample may be unrepresentative (more motivated or curious people respond).

Q2. Name three BPS ethical principles. [3 marks]

  • Cue. Informed consent, the right to withdraw, protection from harm (also deception and confidentiality).

Q3. Explain how debriefing deals with an ethical issue. [2 marks]

  • Cue. A debrief explains the study's true aims at the end, restores participants' understanding after any deception, and offers the right to withdraw their data.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Eduqas 20186 marksA researcher recruits the first 20 students who walk into the library. Identify this sampling method and explain one strength and one weakness. [6 marks]
Show worked answer →

An identification and evaluation item (AO2/AO3).

Method: opportunity sampling (selecting whoever is available and willing at the time).

Strength: it is quick, easy and convenient, so data can be gathered with little time or cost.

Weakness: it is likely to be biased and unrepresentative (here, only library-using students at one time of day), so the findings may not generalise to the wider target population.

Markers reward correct identification of opportunity sampling and a clear strength and weakness focused on convenience versus bias.

Eduqas 20218 marksExplain how a researcher could deal with the ethical issues of deception and protection from harm in a study. [8 marks]
Show worked answer →

An application item on ethics (AO2/AO3).

Deception: avoid it where possible; if some deception is unavoidable (to prevent demand characteristics), keep it minimal, gain approval from an ethics committee, and fully debrief participants afterwards, explaining the true aims and offering the right to withdraw their data. Presumptive or prior general consent can also help.

Protection from harm: ensure risk is no greater than everyday life, monitor participants during the study, stop if distress occurs, remind them of the right to withdraw, and debrief, offering follow-up support if needed (for example counselling).

Markers reward practical, principle-based strategies (ethics committee, debrief, right to withdraw, monitoring) tied to each issue.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this