Skip to main content
EnglandPsychologySyllabus dot point

Should the mother be the primary caregiver of an infant, or can others fill that role equally well?

Contemporary debate for the psychodynamic approach: the mother as the primary caregiver of an infant. Arguments for and against, with a judgement.

An Eduqas A-Level Psychology answer to the psychodynamic approach's contemporary debate, the mother as the primary caregiver of an infant. Covers the arguments for (attachment theory, maternal deprivation) and against (multiple attachments, fathers and others, social bias), and how to reach a judgement on the Past to Present paper.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.814 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. The answer
  3. Examples in context
  4. Try this

What this dot point is asking

The mother as the primary caregiver of an infant is the contemporary debate attached to the psychodynamic approach in Component 1 (the psychodynamic emphasis on early childhood links to attachment). You must outline the arguments for and against, and reach a judgement.

The answer

What the debate is about

Arguments for

  • Attachment theory and monotropy. Bowlby argued for one special attachment (often the mother) during a critical period, with maternal deprivation linked to later harm.
  • Early maternal role. Mothers are often the main early carer (for example through breastfeeding) and form an early bond.
  • A secure base. A consistent primary attachment supports an internal working model for later relationships.

Arguments against

  • Multiple attachments. Research (Schaffer and Emerson) shows infants form several attachments, not just one to the mother.
  • Fathers and others can do it. Fathers and other carers can be just as sensitive and responsive; the role is not biologically fixed to mothers.
  • Quality over identity. The quality of care matters more than who provides it; high-quality day care does not harm development.
  • Social and cultural bias. The claim can reflect an outdated assumption about women's roles rather than evidence.

Reaching a judgement

A balanced conclusion is that what matters is sensitive, consistent, high-quality care, which can be provided by the mother, the father or another consistent carer. The modern view values a secure early attachment but rejects the idea that the mother specifically must be the primary caregiver.

Examples in context

Example 1. Fathers as primary carers. Where fathers are the main carer, infants form secure attachments to them, showing the role is about sensitivity and consistency, not the carer's sex. This directly supports the "fathers and others can do it" argument.

Example 2. Quality day care. Studies of high-quality day care find no general harm to attachment or development, which undermines the strong claim that only continuous maternal care prevents harm and supports the "quality over identity" argument.

Try this

Q1. State one argument that the mother should be the primary caregiver. [2 marks]

  • Cue. Attachment theory (Bowlby) proposes monotropy, one special attachment (often the mother) in a critical period, with maternal deprivation linked to later harm.

Q2. Explain one argument against the mother being the primary caregiver. [3 marks]

  • Cue. Infants form multiple attachments (Schaffer and Emerson), and fathers and other carers can be equally sensitive and responsive, so the quality of care matters more than who provides it.

Q3. State a balanced conclusion to the debate. [2 marks]

  • Cue. A secure early attachment matters, but it can be provided by the mother, the father or another consistent, sensitive carer, so the mother need not specifically be the primary caregiver.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

Eduqas 201910 marksOutline arguments for and against the view that the mother should be the primary caregiver of an infant. [10 marks]
Show worked answer →

An item testing both sides of the debate (AO1/AO3).

For: psychodynamic theory and Bowlby's attachment theory stress an early, close bond, and Bowlby argued for monotropy (one special attachment, often the mother) during a critical period, with maternal deprivation linked to later harm; mothers are often the main carer in early infancy (for example through breastfeeding); and a consistent primary attachment supports an internal working model for later relationships.

Against: research shows infants form multiple attachments (Schaffer and Emerson), and fathers and other carers can be just as sensitive and responsive; the quality of care matters more than who provides it; the claim can reflect social and cultural bias (an outdated assumption about women's roles); and high-quality day care and shared parenting do not harm development.

Markers reward developed points on both sides, with theory and evidence, and a contrast.

Eduqas 202112 marksDiscuss the contemporary debate about whether the mother should be the primary caregiver of an infant. [12 marks]
Show worked answer →

A discussion item (AO1 plus AO3) reaching a judgement.

A strong answer outlines the debate (psychodynamic and attachment theory suggest an early bond is vital, but who provides it is contested), then develops both sides: monotropy, a critical period and maternal deprivation against multiple attachments, the capability of fathers and others, the priority of care quality, and social or cultural bias.

It then reaches a judgement: what matters is sensitive, consistent, high-quality care, which can be provided by the mother, the father or another consistent carer, so the modern view rejects the idea that the mother specifically must be the primary caregiver while still valuing a secure early attachment.

Markers reward balanced development and a justified conclusion.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this