What are the tectonic hazards, and what primary and secondary impacts do they cause?
The nature of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis; their measurement; and their primary and secondary, social, economic and environmental impacts.
An Eduqas A-Level Geography answer to the nature and impacts of tectonic hazards in Component 3, covering earthquakes (focus, epicentre, magnitude scales), volcanic eruptions (types, the VEI, hazards) and tsunamis, and their primary and secondary, social, economic and environmental impacts, with contrasting case studies.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
Eduqas wants you to explain the nature of earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis, how they are measured, and their primary and secondary social, economic and environmental impacts, and why those impacts vary.
The answer
Earthquakes and their measurement
Earthquakes occur where accumulated strain at a fault is released suddenly. The moment magnitude scale is logarithmic, so each whole number is about times more energy: a magnitude quake releases roughly times the energy of a magnitude . Shallow earthquakes (a focus near the surface) are far more destructive than deep ones because the energy reaches the surface with less attenuation. The intensity of shaking, and so the damage, depends on magnitude, depth, distance, and crucially the local geology (soft sediments amplify shaking) and building quality.
Volcanoes and tsunamis
Volcanic style depends on magma chemistry: runny basaltic magma produces gentle effusive eruptions, while viscous, gas-rich andesitic magma traps pressure and erupts explosively, generating fast, lethal pyroclastic flows and widespread ash. Tsunamis are generated when a megathrust earthquake (or landslide) suddenly displaces a column of water; the waves travel across the ocean at jet speed and rear up on reaching shallow coasts, causing catastrophic coastal flooding, as in 2004 and 2011.
Primary and secondary impacts
Impacts are classified as primary (the immediate, direct effects of the event: building collapse, lava and pyroclastic flows, the deaths and injuries they cause) and secondary (the indirect effects that follow: tsunamis, landslides, liquefaction, fires from ruptured gas mains, disease from broken sanitation, homelessness and long-term economic disruption). Each is also social (deaths, injury, displacement), economic (damage, lost output, cost of recovery) and environmental (landscape change, habitat loss). A central Eduqas point is that secondary impacts frequently cause more deaths and longer-term harm than the primary event, as the Tohoku tsunami did, and that the scale of impact depends on the interaction of physical magnitude with human vulnerability.
Examples in context
Example 1. The Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, Japan (2011). A magnitude megathrust earthquake off north-east Japan, at a destructive boundary, generated a tsunami over m high that overwhelmed coastal defences, killed around people and triggered the Fukushima nuclear accident. The primary impact (shaking) caused relatively few deaths because Japan's buildings are well engineered; the overwhelming majority of deaths were a secondary impact, the tsunami. Economic losses exceeded billion US dollars. Tohoku is the standard Eduqas case showing that secondary impacts can dominate and that even a high-income, well-prepared country can be overwhelmed.
Example 2. Mount Pinatubo eruption, Philippines (1991). The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, a subduction-zone (destructive boundary) volcano, was one of the largest of the twentieth century (VEI 6), producing huge pyroclastic flows, vast ash falls and, in the following years, deadly lahars when monsoon rain mobilised the ash. Successful monitoring and evacuation beforehand saved many thousands of lives, though lahars continued to cause damage and displacement for years afterwards. Pinatubo illustrates explosive volcanic hazards, the importance of secondary hazards (lahars) and the value of monitoring, a versatile Eduqas example.
Try this
Q1. Distinguish between the focus and the epicentre of an earthquake. [2 marks]
- Cue. The focus is the point at depth where the fault ruptures and energy is released; the epicentre is the point on the surface directly above the focus.
Q2. Explain why the secondary impacts of a tectonic hazard can be greater than the primary impacts. [3 marks]
- Cue. Secondary impacts (tsunamis, landslides, liquefaction, fire, disease) can affect far larger areas and populations and persist for years, often killing more people than the immediate shaking or eruption, as the Tohoku tsunami did.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of WJEC Eduqas exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
Eduqas 2019 (style)6 marksExplain the difference between the primary and secondary impacts of a tectonic hazard.Show worked answer →
Define each and give clear examples for an earthquake or eruption.
Primary impacts are the immediate, direct effects of the event itself: ground shaking collapsing buildings, lava and pyroclastic flows, and the immediate deaths and damage they cause.
Secondary impacts are the indirect effects that follow on: tsunamis, landslides, liquefaction, fires, disease, homelessness, and economic disruption in the days, months and years afterwards.
A strong answer notes that secondary impacts often cause more deaths and longer-term harm than the primary event (as the Tohoku tsunami did), and uses a named case.
Markers reward the primary-secondary distinction with examples and the point that secondary impacts can dominate.
Eduqas 2022 (style)12 marksAssess the reasons why some tectonic events cause far greater impacts than others.Show worked answer →
A 12-mark extended response needing a judgement, structured around the controls on impact.
Identify the physical controls: magnitude, depth (shallow is worse), type of hazard, and secondary hazards (tsunami, liquefaction).
Identify the human controls: population density, building quality, level of development, governance, warning systems and preparedness, captured by risk equals hazard times vulnerability divided by capacity to cope.
Use a contrast (Haiti 2010 versus Tohoku 2011) to argue that vulnerability and capacity to cope, set by development, often matter more than magnitude.
Conclude with a supported judgement that the toll is determined by the interaction of physical and human factors, with development and management frequently decisive.
Markers reward a balanced, exemplified judgement weighing physical against human controls.
Related dot points
- The structure of the Earth and the theory of plate tectonics; the types of plate boundary and hotspots; and how these explain the global distribution of tectonic hazards.
An Eduqas A-Level Geography answer to plate tectonics and tectonic hazards in Component 3, covering the structure of the Earth, the theory of plate tectonics and its driving forces, the types of plate boundary (constructive, destructive, conservative, collision) and hotspots, and how these explain the global distribution of earthquakes and volcanoes.
- The concepts of hazard, risk, vulnerability and resilience; the hazard risk equation; the factors that shape vulnerability; and the role of development and governance.
An Eduqas A-Level Geography answer to hazard vulnerability and resilience in Component 3, covering the concepts of hazard, risk, vulnerability and resilience, the hazard risk equation, the factors that shape vulnerability (development, governance, population density, building quality, perception), and contrasting developed and developing outcomes, with case studies.
- Prediction, monitoring and forecasting; the hazard management cycle and the Park model; mitigation, building design and planning; and the contrast between developed and developing responses.
An Eduqas A-Level Geography answer to tectonic hazard management and response in Component 3, covering prediction, monitoring and forecasting, the hazard management cycle (mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery), the Park model of disaster response, mitigation through building design and land-use planning, and the contrast between developed and developing responses, with case studies.
- Multi-hazard environments where tectonic and other hazards overlap; the reasons people live with hazard risk; and how disaster risk can be reduced in these complex settings.
An Eduqas A-Level Geography answer to multi-hazard environments in Component 3, covering places where tectonic and other natural hazards overlap, the concept of disaster hotspots, why people continue to live with hazard risk, and how disaster risk can be reduced in complex settings, with case studies such as the Philippines and Japan.
- The synoptic 21st Century Challenges; drawing together physical and human geography across scales; and evaluating strategies and futures for issues such as climate change, resource security and inequality.
An Eduqas A-Level Geography answer to the synoptic 21st Century Challenges in Component 2 Section C, covering how to draw together physical and human geography across scales, the great contemporary challenges (climate change, resource security, migration, inequality, urbanisation), the use of a stimulus resource, and how to evaluate strategies and futures synoptically.
Sources & how we know this
- Eduqas A-level Geography specification (from 2016) — Eduqas (2016)