How do everyday processes inside schools shape pupils' experiences and outcomes?
Relationships and processes within schools, including teacher labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and setting, pupil identities and subcultures, and the hidden curriculum.
A focused answer to the AQA A-Level Sociology Education topic on in-school processes, covering teacher labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming, pupil identities and subcultures, and the hidden curriculum.
Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed
Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page
Jump to a section
What this dot point is asking
AQA wants you to explain the interactionist account of what happens inside schools: how teacher labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming, pupil subcultures and the hidden curriculum shape identities and outcomes. A strong answer notes that labels can be resisted, so the processes are not automatic.
Labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy
A label is a definition attached to someone. Becker found teachers evaluate pupils against an image of the "ideal pupil", strongly influenced by class and ethnicity, so pupils who fit the image (often middle class) are labelled favourably. Keddie found teachers gave high-stream pupils more abstract, valued knowledge, reinforcing the divide.
A negative label can produce a self-fulfilling prophecy: the pupil internalises it, behaves accordingly, and the prediction comes true. Rosenthal and Jacobson's "Pygmalion in the Classroom" showed that telling teachers certain (randomly chosen) pupils were "spurters" led those pupils to make more progress, demonstrating the power of teacher expectation. The reverse works too: pupils labelled as failures may give up.
Streaming, setting and subcultures
Streaming places pupils in ability groups across all subjects; setting does so subject by subject. Both can confirm labels and limit opportunity, since lower streams are often taught a restricted curriculum by less experienced staff. Gillborn and Youdell describe educational triage, where marketisation pushes schools to concentrate on borderline (C/D) pupils to improve league-table positions, while those labelled hopeless are neglected (an "A-to-C economy").
Lacey describes differentiation and polarisation: teachers rank (differentiate) pupils, who then polarise into a pro-school subculture (accepting school values, mainly higher streams) or an anti-school subculture (gaining status by rejecting them, mainly lower streams). However, Fuller's study of Black girls showed pupils can reject a negative label and work hard to prove it wrong, so polarisation is not inevitable.
The hidden curriculum
Marxists (Bowles and Gintis) argue the hidden curriculum prepares pupils for an exploitative workplace through the correspondence principle, teaching them to accept authority, hierarchy and external rewards (grades standing in for wages). Feminists argue it also transmits patriarchal values, while functionalists see it as teaching the shared norms society needs.
Evaluation
Interactionism shows schools actively shape outcomes, challenging purely external (home-based) explanations of achievement. Critics argue it is too deterministic if labels always come true, ignoring cases where pupils resist (Fuller), and that it focuses on the classroom while ignoring the wider structures (Marxists ask why teachers hold class and ethnic stereotypes in the first place). The most balanced view is that in-school processes interact with home background rather than replacing it.
Exam-style practice questions
Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.
AQA 201810 marksApplying material from Item A, analyse two ways in which processes within schools may affect pupils' achievement.Show worked answer →
A Paper 1 (Education) 10 mark "analyse" item with an item: two developed paragraphs, each applying the item.
Way one: labelling and the self-fulfilling prophecy. Teachers judge pupils against the "ideal pupil" (Becker); negative labels can be internalised so the prediction comes true (Rosenthal and Jacobson).
Way two: streaming and subcultures. Placing pupils in sets can confirm labels and push them into pro- or anti-school subcultures (Lacey's differentiation and polarisation), shaping effort and attainment.
Markers reward two developed ways tied to the item, with brief evaluation (for example that labels can be rejected, as in Fuller's study).
AQA 202110 marksOutline and explain two criticisms of the labelling theory of pupil achievement.Show worked answer →
Two developed paragraphs, no item.
Criticism one: it can be too deterministic. Labelling theory implies a label always leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy, but Fuller's study of Black girls shows pupils can reject a negative label and work harder to disprove it, so the outcome is not automatic.
Criticism two: it ignores wider structures. Marxists argue labelling theory focuses on the classroom and overlooks why teachers hold class- and ethnicity-based stereotypes in the first place, which reflect wider inequalities in capitalist society.
Markers reward two distinct, developed criticisms.
Related dot points
- Functionalist, Marxist, New Right and other perspectives on the role and purpose of the education system, including socialisation, role allocation, the correspondence principle and human capital.
A focused answer to the AQA A-Level Sociology Education topic on the role and functions of education, covering functionalist, Marxist, New Right and feminist perspectives, the correspondence principle, meritocracy and human capital.
- External factors (material deprivation, cultural deprivation, cultural capital) and internal factors (labelling, streaming, pupil subcultures) explaining social-class differences in educational achievement.
A focused answer to the AQA A-Level Sociology Education topic on class differences in achievement, covering external factors (material and cultural deprivation, cultural capital) and internal school factors (labelling, the self-fulfilling prophecy, streaming and subcultures).
- Gender differences in achievement and subject choice, and ethnic differences in achievement, explained through external factors and internal school processes including teacher labelling and ethnocentric curricula.
A focused answer to the AQA A-Level Sociology Education topic on gender and ethnic differences in achievement, covering the reversal of the gender gap, gendered subject choice, and external and internal explanations of ethnic differences including labelling and ethnocentric curricula.
- The significance of educational policies, including selection, comprehensivisation, marketisation and privatisation, and policies to achieve greater equality of opportunity or outcome by class, gender and ethnicity.
A focused answer to the AQA A-Level Sociology Education topic on educational policy, covering the tripartite system, comprehensivisation, marketisation and parentocracy, privatisation, globalisation and policies on class, gender and ethnic equality.
- Social action and interactionist theories and postmodernism, including symbolic interactionism, phenomenology, ethnomethodology, Weber's social action theory and the structure-action debate.
A focused answer to the AQA A-Level Sociology Theory and Methods topic on social action theories, covering Weber, symbolic interactionism, phenomenology, ethnomethodology, the structure-action debate and postmodernism.
Sources & how we know this
- AQA A-level Sociology (7192) specification — AQA (2015)