Skip to main content
EnglandPoliticsSyllabus dot point

What are the core ideas of nationalism and how do its strands differ?

The core ideas and principles of nationalism, the differences between liberal, conservative, expansionist and post-colonial nationalism, and the views of the key thinkers Rousseau, Herder, Mazzini, Maurras and Garvey.

A focused answer to AQA A-Level Politics on the core ideas of nationalism, the differences between liberal, conservative, expansionist and anti-colonial or post-colonial nationalism, and the views of the key thinkers Rousseau, Herder, Mazzini, Maurras and Garvey.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.812 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Core ideas of nationalism
  3. Types of nationalism
  4. The key thinkers

What this dot point is asking

AQA wants you to explain the core ideas of nationalism (the nation, self-determination, nation-state, culturalism and racialism), distinguish its main types, and apply the ideas of the five key thinkers: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Johann Gottfried von Herder, Giuseppe Mazzini, Charles Maurras and Marcus Garvey. Nationalism is one of the optional non-core ideologies in Paper 2, Section B, examined with a 9-mark "explain and analyse three" and a 25-mark essay.

Core ideas of nationalism

The central idea is the nation itself, a group bound by some combination of shared language, culture, history, religion, territory and a sense of common identity. Nationalists divide over whether the nation is essentially cultural or ethnic (organic, rooted in language and heritage, as Herder argued) or civic or political (a community of citizens bound by shared values and consent, as Rousseau and Mazzini argued). From the nation flows self-determination: the claim that each nation has the right to govern itself rather than be ruled by others, which fuelled both 19th-century unification movements and 20th-century decolonisation. The ideal political form is the nation-state, in which political and national boundaries coincide, giving a people sovereign control over their own affairs. Culturalism stresses preserving and celebrating a distinct national culture. In its most extreme forms, nationalism shades into racialism and chauvinism, asserting the superiority of one nation or race over others. Nationalism is unusual in that it attaches to other ideologies, producing liberal, conservative, socialist, expansionist and anti-colonial variants.

Types of nationalism

Liberal nationalism, the earliest form, links the nation to liberal values: self-determination, popular sovereignty, constitutional government and a harmonious international order of self-governing states (the vision behind Woodrow Wilson's Fourteen Points). Conservative nationalism is more defensive, valuing the nation as a source of tradition, identity, social cohesion and order, often emerging when national identity feels threatened. Expansionist (integral) nationalism is intense and chauvinistic, asserting national greatness and superiority, glorifying war and conquest, and often resting on racial or ethnic exclusivity (its extreme expression is fascist ultranationalism). Anti-colonial and post-colonial nationalism developed in Africa, Asia and the Caribbean as a movement for liberation from European empire, frequently blending nationalism with socialism or with assertions of racial pride and cultural revival.

The key thinkers

  • Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712 to 1778): his theory of popular sovereignty and the general will treats the nation as a self-governing community of citizens whose collective will is sovereign; a foundation for civic and liberal nationalism.
  • Johann Gottfried von Herder (1744 to 1803): the founder of cultural nationalism; each nation possesses a unique spirit, the Volksgeist, expressed through its language, customs and history, so culture, not the state, defines the nation.
  • Giuseppe Mazzini (1805 to 1872): the leading liberal nationalist; nations have both a right and a duty to unify and free themselves (as in Italian unification, the Risorgimento), and free nations would form a peaceful brotherhood.
  • Charles Maurras (1868 to 1952): the theorist of integral nationalism; an exclusive, reactionary, anti-liberal nationalism that places the nation above the individual and was deeply hostile to democracy and outsiders.
  • Marcus Garvey (1887 to 1940): advocate of black nationalism and pan-Africanism; he promoted racial pride, the unity and self-determination of people of African descent, and a "back to Africa" vision against colonial domination.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AQA 20189 marksExplain and analyse three nationalist ideas about the nation. (Paper 2, Section B, non-core ideology)
Show worked answer →

Three distinct, developed points, each with a named thinker and analysis.

One: the nation as the natural unit of political organisation. Nationalists hold that humanity is divided into nations, each with a distinct identity, and that the nation should govern itself; this leads to the ideal of the nation-state, where political and national boundaries coincide.

Two: the cultural nation. Herder's cultural nationalism argues each nation has a unique spirit, the Volksgeist, expressed through language, customs and history; the nation is therefore organic and rooted in culture, not just citizenship.

Three: the political or civic nation. Rousseau's popular sovereignty and general will treat the nation as a community of citizens bound by shared political will; Mazzini built liberal nationalism on the duty of nations to unify and free themselves.

Markers reward the distinction between cultural and political conceptions of the nation, accurate thinkers, and analysis of why self-determination follows from each.

AQA 20229 marksExplain and analyse three ways in which liberal nationalism differs from expansionist nationalism. (Paper 2, Section B, non-core ideology)
Show worked answer →

A tensions question: emphasise genuine disagreement between the strands.

One: inclusivity. Liberal nationalism (Mazzini) is inclusive and civic, open to all who share citizenship and supportive of every nation's self-determination; expansionist nationalism (Maurras) is exclusive, defining the nation narrowly and often racially.

Two: relations between nations. Liberal nationalists envisage a peaceful community or brotherhood of self-governing nations; expansionist nationalists assert national superiority and pursue conquest, chauvinism and militarism.

Three: the individual. Liberal nationalism is compatible with individual rights and popular sovereignty; integral nationalism subordinates the individual entirely to the nation, an anti-liberal position.

Markers reward precise contrasts on inclusivity, international relations and the individual, correct thinkers, and analysis of why these are deep divisions within nationalism.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this