Skip to main content
EnglandHistorySyllabus dot point

Why did Gorbachev's reforms fail to save the Soviet Union and instead hasten its collapse in 1991?

The end of the USSR 1985 to 1991: Gorbachev's perestroika and glasnost, the loosening of the bloc and nationalism, the 1991 coup, and the collapse of the Soviet Union.

A focused guide to Gorbachev and the collapse of the Soviet Union for AQA A-Level History (Russia). Covers perestroika and glasnost, the loosening of the Eastern bloc and rising nationalism, the August 1991 coup, and the dissolution of the USSR.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.811 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Perestroika and glasnost
  3. The loosening of the bloc
  4. Nationalism and Yeltsin
  5. The 1991 coup and collapse
  6. Try this

What this dot point is asking

You need to explain why Gorbachev's reforms (perestroika and glasnost) failed to save the Soviet Union, how the Eastern bloc and Soviet republics broke away, and how the August 1991 coup led to the collapse of the USSR.

Perestroika and glasnost

In practice the two policies pulled against each other. Glasnost released a flood of criticism that, once started, could not be limited: revelations about Stalin's crimes, Chernobyl (1986) and the war in Afghanistan discredited the party, while newly free expression gave nationalist movements in the Baltic states, the Caucasus and Ukraine a voice and a platform. Perestroika half-dismantled the command economy (the 1987 Law on State Enterprises, the legalisation of small cooperatives) without building working markets, so the old system of plan targets broke down before anything replaced it, and shortages worsened. Gorbachev had loosened control faster than he could manage the consequences.

The loosening of the bloc

Nationalism and Yeltsin

Within the USSR, nationalism surged: the Baltic republics (Lithuania declared independence in 1990), the Caucasus and others demanded to leave the union, and Gorbachev's attempts to negotiate a looser Union Treaty satisfied no one. Crucially, in Russia itself, Boris Yeltsin emerged as a rival pole of power. Having broken with Gorbachev, he was elected President of the Russian Republic in June 1991, championing radical reform and Russian sovereignty against the union centre, so that the largest republic now pulled away from the very state Gorbachev led.

The 1991 coup and collapse

In August 1991 hardline Communists, fearing the new Union Treaty would dissolve the USSR, staged a coup, placing Gorbachev under house arrest in the Crimea. It collapsed within three days: the plotters were irresolute, the army would not fire on civilians, and Yeltsin climbed onto a tank outside the Russian parliament to rally defiance, becoming the hero of the hour. The coup destroyed what authority Gorbachev and the Communist Party had left. Over the following months the republics declared independence one after another; in December the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus dissolved the union and formed the Commonwealth of Independent States. The Soviet Union was formally dissolved at the end of 1991, and Gorbachev resigned on 25 December.

Try this

Q1. What did glasnost mean? [2 marks]

  • Cue. "Openness": relaxing censorship and allowing public criticism and debate.

Q2. What was the significance of the August 1991 coup? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Its failure discredited the hardliners and Gorbachev and hastened the dissolution of the USSR.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AQA 202020 marks'Gorbachev's own reforms were the main reason for the collapse of the USSR in the years 1985 to 1991.' Assess the validity of this view. (Component 2, depth essay, rescoped from 25)
Show worked answer →

Weigh Gorbachev's reforms against the deeper inherited problems and rank them.

Argue for the claim: glasnost unleashed criticism and nationalism the system could not contain; perestroika disrupted the planned economy without building a working market; and abandoning the Brezhnev Doctrine let the Eastern bloc fall in 1989, fatally weakening the centre.

Weigh the other factors: decades of Brezhnev-era stagnation, the unaffordable arms race with the United States, deep-rooted ethnic nationalism in the republics, and the rise of Yeltsin as a rival pole of power in Russia.

Reach a judgement. Markers reward ranking, for example that the reforms were the trigger but acted on a system already failing, so they accelerated rather than caused the collapse. A top level answer sustains that argument.

AQA 20226 marksWith reference to a Western newspaper report on the August 1991 coup and your own knowledge, assess its value for studying the fall of Gorbachev. (Component 2, source skill)
Show worked answer →

A short source question rewards judging value through provenance, content and context.

Provenance: a Western newspaper writes from outside the USSR, with access to its own reporting but a Cold War-era interpretive lens, so it gives immediacy and an outsider's analysis but may misread internal Soviet dynamics.

Content and tone: weigh its account of the coup, Yeltsin's defiance on the tank, and Gorbachev's isolation against your knowledge of why the coup failed.

Judgement: a historian could reliably learn how events were understood at the time and the symbolism of Yeltsin's stand, but must cross-check detail and watch for Western framing. Markers reward a clear value judgement set against context.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this