Skip to main content
EnglandHistorySyllabus dot point

How did the Nazis turn the office of Chancellor into a total dictatorship, and how did the regime function in peace and war?

Nazi Germany 1933 to 1945: the consolidation of dictatorship, the terror and propaganda state, economic and social policy, persecution and the Holocaust, and the impact of total war.

A focused guide to Nazi Germany from 1933 to 1945 for AQA A-Level History (Germany). Covers the consolidation of dictatorship, the police and propaganda state, economic and social policy, the persecution of Jews and others and the Holocaust, and the impact of total war.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.812 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this dot point is asking
  2. Consolidating the dictatorship
  3. Terror and propaganda
  4. Economy and society
  5. Persecution and the Holocaust
  6. Total war
  7. Try this

What this dot point is asking

You need to explain how the Nazis turned Hitler's chancellorship into a total dictatorship in 1933 to 1934, how the regime ruled through terror and propaganda, its economic and social policies, the persecution culminating in the Holocaust, and the impact of total war.

Consolidating the dictatorship

The Nazis then moved through a process of Gleichschaltung (coordination): they banned the other parties (the Law against the Formation of New Parties, July 1933) to create a one-party state, abolished free trade unions and replaced them with the German Labour Front, and brought the state governments and civil society under Nazi control. The radical SA under Rohm, whose talk of a "second revolution" alarmed the army and elites, was destroyed in the Night of the Long Knives (June 1934), in which Rohm and other rivals were murdered. On Hindenburg's death in August 1934, Hitler merged the offices of Chancellor and President as Fuhrer and made the army swear a personal oath to him, completing the dictatorship within nineteen months.

Terror and propaganda

The relationship between fear and consent is the key AQA debate. The older picture of an all-seeing Gestapo terrorising a cowed population has been revised by historians such as Robert Gellately, who showed the Gestapo was understaffed and relied heavily on voluntary denunciations from ordinary Germans, implying widespread collusion rather than pure coercion. Propaganda saturated daily life through radio, film (Riefenstahl), rallies and press control, while economic recovery and foreign triumphs generated genuine enthusiasm, what Ian Kershaw called the "Hitler myth". The strongest answers see terror and consent as mutually reinforcing.

Economy and society

  • Economic recovery under Schacht cut unemployment, followed by the Four Year Plan (1936) under Goring driving rearmament and autarky.
  • Social policy targeted women (children, church, kitchen), youth (Hitler Youth) and workers (the German Labour Front replacing trade unions).

Persecution and the Holocaust

Anti-Jewish persecution escalated from boycotts and the Nuremberg Laws (1935), through the violence of Kristallnacht (1938), to systematic genocide during the war. The Holocaust murdered around six million Jews, alongside Roma, disabled people and political prisoners.

Total war

Germany entered the war geared for short, sharp Blitzkrieg campaigns rather than a long struggle. After the failure to defeat the USSR and the entry of the United States, the regime shifted from 1942 to total war under Speer's armaments drive, which raised output sharply through rationalisation and the brutal use of millions of forced and slave labourers. The home front endured intensifying Allied strategic bombing of cities. The combination of overwhelming Allied resources and the moral and military exhaustion of the regime brought defeat, ending with Hitler's suicide and the German surrender in May 1945.

Try this

Q1. What did the Enabling Act (1933) allow? [2 marks]

  • Cue. The government to pass laws without the Reichstag, ending parliamentary democracy.

Q2. What were the Nuremberg Laws (1935)? [2 marks]

  • Cue. Anti-Jewish laws stripping Jews of citizenship and banning marriage with non-Jews.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AQA 201920 marks'Nazi control of Germany in the years 1933 to 1939 rested mainly on terror.' Assess the validity of this view. (Component 2, depth essay, rescoped from 25)
Show worked answer →

Weigh terror against propaganda and genuine consent, and rank them.

Argue for terror: the SS and Gestapo, the concentration camps, the destruction of opposition parties and trade unions, and the climate of fear and denunciation that enforced outward conformity.

Argue against: Goebbels's propaganda and the powerful cult of the Fuhrer, the apparent economic recovery and fall in unemployment, foreign policy successes, and the genuine popularity these won for the regime among many Germans.

Reach a judgement. Markers reward engaging the historiography (the Gestapo as an all-seeing terror machine versus Robert Gellately's argument that it relied heavily on voluntary denunciations and popular collusion) and ranking the factors. A strong line is that terror and consent reinforced each other rather than one alone holding the regime.

AQA 20216 marksWith reference to a 1934 Nazi poster on the Night of the Long Knives and your own knowledge, assess its value for studying how Hitler consolidated power. (Component 2, source skill)
Show worked answer →

A short source question rewards judging value through provenance, content and context.

Provenance: a Nazi poster is regime propaganda, so it is weak as a record of what really happened but strong evidence of how the regime justified the purge to the public.

Content and tone: weigh how it frames the killings as Hitler defending the nation against treachery, against the reality that he was eliminating the SA leadership and other rivals.

Judgement: a historian could reliably learn the regime's self-presentation and propaganda methods around June 1934, but must treat the factual claims with great caution. Markers reward turning the propaganda into usable evidence of regime aims.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this