Skip to main content
EnglandEnglish LanguageSyllabus dot point

How do children learn to write, from first marks to organised text?

Written language development: Kroll's stages, spelling development, the move from speech-like to written forms, and the development of genre and organisation in children's writing.

A focused answer to the AQA A-Level English Language child writing topic, covering Kroll's stages of writing, spelling development, the shift from speech-like to written forms, and the growth of genre awareness and text organisation in children's writing.

Generated by Claude Opus 4.810 min answer

Reviewed by: AI editorial process; not yet individually human-reviewed

Have a quick question? Jump to the Q&A page

Jump to a section
  1. What this topic is asking
  2. Kroll's stages of writing development
  3. Spelling development
  4. Genre, organisation and cohesion
  5. Try this

What this topic is asking

AQA wants you to describe how children's writing develops: the recognised stages, how spelling progresses, how writing moves away from speech-like forms, and how children gain control of genre and text organisation. In a data response you must place a writing sample in a developmental model, quote features at each level, and frame errors as evidence of learning rather than as failure.

Kroll's stages of writing development

The most useful idea here is that early writing is speech-like. Young children write the way they talk: short, additive, loosely connected and informal, because spoken language is the system they already command. The developmental journey is, in part, the gradual differentiation of writing as a distinct mode with its own conventions (planning, paragraphing, formal register) that speech does not need. When you analyse a sample, the degree of separation from speech is one of your best clues to the stage.

Spelling development

The exam point about spelling is interpretive. A child who writes "skool" or "thay" has accurately mapped the sounds onto plausible letters; the only thing missing is knowledge of the irregular English convention. That is rule-application, not carelessness, and it supports the cognitive and nativist view that children actively construct the system rather than copy it. As children read more and absorb morphology (the stable spelling of a morpheme such as "-ed" or "-tion" regardless of how it sounds), their spelling moves towards convention.

Genre, organisation and cohesion

When analysing child writing, work across three levels. Physical features (letter formation, directionality) tell you about motor and orthographic control. Orthographic features (the spelling stage) place the child on the phonetic-to-conventional path. Discourse features (cohesion, sentence variety, genre markers, organisation) reveal how far writing has differentiated from speech. Reading all three together lets you place the sample confidently in Kroll's model.

Try this

  • Take a child's writing sample and label one physical, one orthographic and one discourse feature.
  • Rewrite an invented spelling and explain what sound-to-letter rule the child has correctly applied.
  • Decide which Kroll stage a "speech-like" sample (clauses chained with "and then") most likely fits and justify it.

Exam-style practice questions

Practice questions written in the style of AQA exam questions on this dot point, with worked answer explainers. The year tag is the paper they imitate, not the source.

AQA 201920 marksAnalyse the features of the writing produced by a six-year-old child in the data provided. Refer to relevant stages, features and theory in your answer.
Show worked answer →

A Paper 1 data response rewarding AO1, AO2 and AO3. Organise by feature level, not line by line.

Physical and orthographic features: comment on letter formation, and identify the spelling stage (phonetic or invented spellings such as "becos" and "wos" show the child applying sound-to-letter rules). Discourse features: note speech-like cohesion (chaining clauses with "and" and "then"), simple sentence structures, and any emerging paragraphing or genre markers. Place the sample in Kroll's model, typically the consolidation stage where writing resembles speech.

Link to theory: phonetic spelling supports cognitive and nativist rule-building views, and any model provided by a teacher or task supports the role of input. Markers reward accurate stage placement, quoted evidence at each level, and a developmental rather than deficit framing of errors.

AQA 202220 marksExplain how children's spelling develops and what spelling errors reveal about that development. Refer to relevant concepts and examples in your answer.
Show worked answer →

A Paper 1 essay testing AO1 and AO2. Treat spelling as a developmental sequence and errors as evidence.

Trace the move from pre-phonetic marks, through phonetic or invented spelling (writing words as they sound: "becos", "thay", "skool") towards conventional orthography as the child learns that English spelling is not purely phonetic and absorbs morphological and visual patterns (the silent "k", the "-tion" ending). Use Gentry's spelling stages if known (precommunicative, semiphonetic, phonetic, transitional, conventional).

The key argument is that invented spellings are not random failures: a child who writes "wos" for "was" has correctly mapped sounds to letters and simply not yet learned the irregular convention, which is rule-application, not carelessness. Markers reward the developmental framing, named stages or examples, and the link to broader acquisition theory.

Related dot points

Sources & how we know this